### What problem does this PR solve?
0.18.0 mcp server can not start with upgrade from 0.17.2 or new install
except rebuild all docker
Close#7321
mcp server can not start auto from docker :
2025-04-25 17:30:44,512 INFO 25 task_executor_2a9f3e2de99a_0 reported
heartbeat: {"name": "task_executor_2a9f3e2de99a_0", "now":
"2025-04-25T17:30:44.509+08:00", "boot_at":
"2025-04-25T16:43:33.038+08:00", "pending": 0, "lag": 0, "done": 0,
"failed": 0, "current": {}}
usage: server.py [-h] [--base_url BASE_URL] [--host HOST] [--port PORT]
[--mode MODE] [--api_key API_KEY]
server.py: error: unrecognized arguments:
problem:
server.py in docker start arguments not correct , so mcp server start
fail
reason:
```
1. docker-copose.yaml
example - --mcp-host-api-key="ragflow-12345678" is wrong. do not add "" to key or it says:"api-key wrong"
2.docker file entrypoint.sh can not translate config to exec command , we need mapping file from host to docker
- ./entrypoint.sh:/ragflow/entrypoint.sh
3.just add one code raw fix all probelm
```
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] Documentation Update
- [x] Performance Improvement
---------
Co-authored-by: Yongteng Lei <yongtengrey@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Kevin Hu <kevinhu.sh@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Fix the entrypoint file from the docker container to solve #7249
Here is the important part from the logs:
```
docker logs -f ragflow-server
...
usage: server.py [-h] [--base_url BASE_URL] [--host HOST] [--port PORT]
[--mode MODE] [--api_key API_KEY]
server.py: error: unrecognized arguments:
...
```
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Documentation Update
- [ ] Refactoring
- [ ] Performance Improvement
- [ ] Other (please describe):
### What problem does this PR solve?
Add mcp self-host mode, a complement of #7084.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Add MCP support with a client example.
Issue link: #4344
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
### What problem does this PR solve?
This PR gives better control over how we distribute which service will
be loaded. With this approach, we can create containers to run only the
web server and others to run the task executor. It also introduces the
unique ID per task executor host, this will be important when scaling
task executors horizontally, considering unique task executor ids will
be required.
This new `entrypoint.sh` maintains the default behavior of starting the
web server and task executor in the same host.
### Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [X] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Documentation Update
- [ ] Refactoring
- [ ] Performance Improvement
- [ ] Other (please describe):
### What problem does this PR solve?
Introduced jemalloc.
Python uses pymalloc (which is an reimplementation of gblibc malloc) to
manage RES. It has pools for small objects to avoid returning memory to
OS aggressively. My experience is: Replacing pymalloc with
[jemalloc](https://github.com/jemalloc/jemalloc) can reduce RES and
speedup task_executor.py.
### Type of change
- [x] Performance Improvement
### What problem does this PR solve?
This pull request implements the feature mentioned in #3322.
Instead of manually having to edit the `service_conf.yaml` file when
changes have been made to `.env` and mapping it into the docker
container at runtime, a template file is used and the values replaced by
the environment variables from the `.env` file when the container is
started.
### Type of change
- [X] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
---------
Co-authored-by: Kevin Hu <kevinhu.sh@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Zhichang Yu <yuzhichang@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
_Briefly describe what this PR aims to solve. Include background context
that will help reviewers understand the purpose of the PR._
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
Signed-off-by: Jin Hai <haijin.chn@gmail.com>
Added kibana to make elastic management easier.
PR #1710 did this.
PR #1714 revert this.
This PR did again and fix some bugs.
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
### What problem does this PR solve?
### Type of change
- [x] Other (please describe): Use environment variable to control the
task executor processor number.
### What problem does this PR solve?
Let file in knowledgebases visible in file manager.
#162
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Optimize task broker and executor for reduce memory usage and deployment
complexity.
### Type of change
- [x] Performance Improvement
- [x] Refactoring
### Change Log
- Enhance redis utils for message queue(use stream)
- Modify task broker logic via message queue (1.get parse event from
message queue 2.use ThreadPoolExecutor async executor )
- Modify the table column name of document and task (process_duation ->
process_duration maybe just a spelling mistake)
- Reformat some code style(just what i see)
- Add requirement_dev.txt for developer
- Add redis container on docker compose
---------
Co-authored-by: Kevin Hu <kevinhu.sh@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
_Briefly describe what this PR aims to solve. Include background context
that will help reviewers understand the purpose of the PR._
Issue link:#[[Link the issue
here](https://github.com/infiniflow/ragflow/issues/226)]
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
