# Releasing Langflow Langflow follows a **release-when-ready** cadence, with each cycle typically lasting 4–6 weeks depending on QA and stabilization needs. ## Goals * Keep `main` fast-moving for everyday work while ensuring stable release builds when features mature. * Provide an isolated branch for QA and last-minute fixes (the release candidate, RC). * Preserve a linear, readable history wherever possible. * Ensure released code is extensively tested before publication. * Minimize time to resolution of critical bugs. ## Process Overview ### 1. OSS QA Create an OSS release candidate (RC) branch containing `langflow` and any associated PyPI packages (e.g. `lfx`). During this period: * QA is performed manually. * Bug fixes are merged into the RC branch. * New features continue development on `main`. This step usually lasts about a week. ### 2. Desktop QA Once OSS QA and bugfixing are complete, create a Desktop release candidate. * The Desktop RC is based on the final OSS RC. * Manual QA is performed. * Bug fixes are merged into the Desktop RC. * New features continue on `main`. This step also usually lasts about a week. ### 3. Release After QA and bugfixing are complete for both OSS and Desktop: * Final releases are cut from their respective RC branches. * Release timing is coordinated with Langflow's DevRel team. * For at least 24 hours after release, Discord, GitHub, and other support channels should be monitored for critical bug reports. ### 4. Release Artifacts The release workflow automatically publishes the following artifacts: * **PyPI Packages:** * `langflow` - Main package with all integrations * `langflow-base` - Core framework without integrations * `lfx` - Lightweight executor CLI * `langflow-sdk` - SDK for programmatic access (when updated) * **Docker Images:** * `langflowai/langflow` - Full Langflow image * `langflowai/langflow-backend` - Backend-only image (published independently) * `langflowai/langflow-frontend` - Frontend-only image (published independently) * `langflowai/langflow-ep` - Enterprise edition image (published independently) * `langflowai/langflow-base` - Base image without integrations **Note:** Backend, frontend, and enterprise images are published separately from the main image and will be built even if the main version already exists on Docker Hub. ## Branch Model | Branch | Purpose | Merge Policy | | --------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | | **`main`** | Integration branch. All feature PRs target this by default. | **Squash & Merge** (linear history) | | **`release-X.Y.Z`**
(e.g. `release-1.4.3`) | Temporary RC branch. Active only for the release cycle. Accepts QA and blocking-bug PRs labeled `type:release`. | **Squash & Merge** within the branch.
Rebased onto **`main`** before final merge. | ## Release Steps ### 1. Cut Release Candidate ```sh git checkout main && git pull # Ensure local main is up to date git checkout -b release-X.Y.Z # Create new release candidate branch git push -u origin release-X.Y.Z # Push RC branch to remote ``` ### 2. Apply a Bugfix to RC 1. Create a feature branch as usual. 2. Open a GitHub PR targeting `release-X.Y.Z`. 3. Review and approve as normal. 4. Merge into the RC branch after review. ### 3. Review Regression Log Before tagging, review `regressions/X.Y.x.yaml` to confirm no unresolved `blocking` entries exist. If `blocking` entries exist, they should be signed off on. See [regressions/README.md](./regressions/README.md) for the full schema and entry instructions. ### 4. Final Release ```sh git checkout release-X.Y.Z && git pull # Ensure RC branch is up to date git tag vX.Y.Z # Create final release tag git push origin vX.Y.Z # Push tag to remote ``` ### 5. Merge RC Back into Main ```sh git checkout main git merge --ff-only release-X.Y.Z # Fast-forward main to include RC changes ``` ## Merge Strategy 1. **Squash & Merge** everywhere for atomic commits and clean history. 2. While RC is open, periodically re-sync with main: ```sh git checkout release-X.Y.Z git fetch origin git rebase origin/main ``` *This resolves conflicts early while keeping history linear.* 3. Final merge back must be fast-forward only. If not possible, rebase the RC onto `main` before merging. ## Versioning & Tags * Follows [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org): `MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH`. * RC tags use `-rc.N`, e.g. `v1.8.0-rc.1`. * **All tags MUST start with `v` prefix** (e.g., `v1.9.1`, not `1.9.1`). * The release workflow validates this format and rejects tags without the `v` prefix. * Duplicate tags (e.g., both `1.8.3` and `v1.8.3`) cause GitHub's release notes generation to use the wrong base comparison, resulting in incomplete changelogs. * The workflow automatically checks for and prevents duplicate tags. ## LFX Compatibility Langflow and LFX share a **major.minor version line**. The compatibility contract is: > **LFX X.Y.N is guaranteed compatible with any Flow exported from Langflow X.Y.M.** Patch releases (`N` and `M`) are independent — a patch to LFX does not require a Langflow patch release, and vice versa. ### Version management `make patch v=X.Y.Z` updates all four artifacts together: | Artifact | Version set | |---|---| | `langflow` | `X.Y.Z` | | `langflow-base` | `0.Y.Z` | | `lfx` | `X.Y.Z` | | frontend | `X.Y.Z` | ### Cutting an LFX patch release Use `scripts/release-lfx.sh `. The script warns if the LFX minor version does not match the current Langflow minor version, which would violate the compatibility contract. A warning is not a hard block — patch-only LFX releases within the same minor are expected and fine. ### Implications for users Users can pin `lfx~=X.Y.0` in their `requirements.txt` to receive all compatible LFX patch releases for a given Langflow minor. ### Migrating from lfx 0.5.x to 1.10.0 LFX was realigned from its standalone `0.5.x` line onto Langflow's `major.minor` line, so the version jumps from `0.5.0` to `1.10.0` in a single step. This is a version-numbering change, not 95 minors of feature churn. The jump affects downstream pins, and neither pip nor uv will flag it — so it must be called out in the release announcement, not just here: - `lfx==0.5.x` or `lfx<1.0` pins will **not** upgrade (intentional — those deployments stay put). - `lfx>=0.5,<1` pins will **not** upgrade. - `lfx>=0.5` with no upper bound **will** pull `1.10.0` on the next install — a major jump with no warning. Going forward, pin `lfx~=X.Y.0` (e.g. `lfx~=1.10.0`) so you track compatible patches for a given Langflow minor without silently crossing minor lines. ## Roles | Role | Responsibility | | --------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------- | | **Release Captain** (rotates per cycle) | Owns timeline, branch cut, tagging, merge-back. | | **PR Author** | Ensures tests pass; flags PR with `type:release` if needed in RC. | | **CI** | Blocks merges on failing tests or missing labels. | ## FAQ ### Do we ever merge main into the RC? No. Always rebase the RC onto `main` to preserve linear history. ### Can we automate branch deletion? Not yet — merge-back and cleanup are manual. ### How flexible is the timeline? Very flexible. QA and stabilization phases can be extended as needed for quality.